You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Data items for data extraction

From: The causal influence of responsive parenting behaviour on academic readiness: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Category Proposed data collection
Study methods
 Study design RCT
Single or multicentre study; if multicentre, number of recruiting centres
 Enrolment Child age at each assessment (in months)
% participants at post-intervention
% participants at latest follow-up
Participants
 Setting Primary care, hospital, community, home, or combination
 Recruitment region Select one of: (i) USA; (ii) UK; (iii) Canada; (iv) Australia; (v) other (specify)
 Characteristics of participants At baseline:
Sample size
Child sex (percentage male)
Parent sex (percentage male)
Parent race/ethnicity (non-minority, minority, diverse)
Child race/ethnicity (non-minority, minority, diverse)
Child risk status (perinatal/postnatal risk, socio-emotional/behavioural problems)
Socio-demographic risk (education, income)
Family-level risk status (adolescent parent, parent age, mental health)
Intervention
 Components, routes of delivery, timing, frequency, intervention protocols, length of intervention Intervention name (list).
Specific responsive parenting target (coded as affective-emotional responsiveness (e.g., warmth, contingent responding, acceptance), cognitive responsiveness (joint attention, rich verbal input, scaffolding), or positive behavioural guidance (e.g., positive discipline, reinforcement/praise, positive behavioural support, contingencies) or emotion socialization (e.g., emotion coaching, validation)
Parents included, one vs. both
Intensity/duration (brief description of # weeks/sessions)
 Factors relevant to implementation Delivered by (list who administered intervention)
 Definition of ‘control groups’ Comparison group: coded as control; treatment-as-usual; waiting list.